Most governmental power under the Articles of Confederation belonged to
- A. the states.
- B. the king.
- C. the president.
- D. the judiciary.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Under the Articles of Confederation, most governmental power resided with the states, reflecting the desire for local governance and autonomy after independence. This decentralization limited the federal government's authority, making option A the most accurate choice. Option B, the king, is incorrect as the Articles were established to break away from monarchical rule. Option C, the president, is misleading since the Articles did not create a strong executive branch; the role of president was largely ceremonial. Option D, the judiciary, is also wrong as the Articles provided minimal judicial power, leaving most authority with state courts.
Under the Articles of Confederation, most governmental power resided with the states, reflecting the desire for local governance and autonomy after independence. This decentralization limited the federal government's authority, making option A the most accurate choice. Option B, the king, is incorrect as the Articles were established to break away from monarchical rule. Option C, the president, is misleading since the Articles did not create a strong executive branch; the role of president was largely ceremonial. Option D, the judiciary, is also wrong as the Articles provided minimal judicial power, leaving most authority with state courts.
Other Related Questions
The purpose of the U.S. imposing immigration quotas was to
- A. better control who was admitted to the country.
- B. help keep the country neutral during World War II.
- C. increase the number of eligible Germans and Austrians.
- D. put pressure on Germany to stop using concentration camps.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Imposing immigration quotas aimed to better control who was admitted to the U.S., ensuring that specific nationalities were favored or restricted based on political and social considerations. This approach allowed the government to manage demographic changes and maintain national security. Option B is incorrect as immigration quotas were established long before World War II and were not directly related to maintaining neutrality during the conflict. Option C misrepresents the quotas' purpose, as they were not designed to increase the number of Germans and Austrians but rather to limit immigration from certain countries. Option D is also inaccurate; the quotas were not a mechanism to pressure Germany regarding its policies, including concentration camps.
Imposing immigration quotas aimed to better control who was admitted to the U.S., ensuring that specific nationalities were favored or restricted based on political and social considerations. This approach allowed the government to manage demographic changes and maintain national security. Option B is incorrect as immigration quotas were established long before World War II and were not directly related to maintaining neutrality during the conflict. Option C misrepresents the quotas' purpose, as they were not designed to increase the number of Germans and Austrians but rather to limit immigration from certain countries. Option D is also inaccurate; the quotas were not a mechanism to pressure Germany regarding its policies, including concentration camps.
In each of these six court cases, the courts tried to
- A. reflect what the majority of citizens believed.
- B. balance individuals' rights and the needs of society.
- C. protect business interests.
- D. protect states' rights
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
In these court cases, the courts aimed to balance individual rights with societal needs, ensuring that personal freedoms do not infringe upon the welfare of the community. Option A is misleading; while public opinion can influence decisions, courts prioritize constitutional principles over majority beliefs. Option C inaccurately suggests that the primary focus was on business interests, which is not always the case in judicial decisions that often prioritize individual rights and societal impact. Option D misrepresents the courts' broader role, as they frequently address national interests rather than solely protecting states' rights.
In these court cases, the courts aimed to balance individual rights with societal needs, ensuring that personal freedoms do not infringe upon the welfare of the community. Option A is misleading; while public opinion can influence decisions, courts prioritize constitutional principles over majority beliefs. Option C inaccurately suggests that the primary focus was on business interests, which is not always the case in judicial decisions that often prioritize individual rights and societal impact. Option D misrepresents the courts' broader role, as they frequently address national interests rather than solely protecting states' rights.
A police department allows a person suspected of committing a crime to refuse to answer questions asked by the investigating officer. Which amendment protects this right?
- A. Amendment 1
- B. Amendment 4
- C. Amendment 5
- D. Amendment 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, allowing a person suspected of a crime to refuse to answer questions posed by law enforcement. This right ensures that individuals cannot be compelled to provide testimony that could implicate them in a crime. Option A, the First Amendment, pertains to freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition, but does not address self-incrimination. Option B, the Fourth Amendment, protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, but does not relate to questioning. Option D, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions, such as the right to counsel and a fair trial, but does not specifically cover the right to remain silent during questioning.
The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, allowing a person suspected of a crime to refuse to answer questions posed by law enforcement. This right ensures that individuals cannot be compelled to provide testimony that could implicate them in a crime. Option A, the First Amendment, pertains to freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition, but does not address self-incrimination. Option B, the Fourth Amendment, protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, but does not relate to questioning. Option D, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions, such as the right to counsel and a fair trial, but does not specifically cover the right to remain silent during questioning.
Which statement best describes a key aspect of the trade relationship between Grand Coast and Toland?
- A. Grand Coast has the advantage in both timber and fish.
- B. Toland has the comparative advantage in fish.
- C. Toland can produce timber at a lower opportunity cost than Grand Coast.
- D. Grand Coast can produce fish at a lower opportunity cost than Toland.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
In the context of trade relationships, opportunity cost is crucial. Grand Coast can produce fish at a lower opportunity cost than Toland, meaning it sacrifices less in terms of other goods when producing fish. This advantage allows Grand Coast to specialize in fish production, leading to more efficient trade. Option A is incorrect as it suggests Grand Coast has the advantage in both timber and fish, which is unlikely in a comparative advantage scenario. Option B misstates the comparative advantage, assigning it to Toland for fish, which contradicts the opportunity cost analysis. Option C incorrectly asserts that Toland has a lower opportunity cost for timber, which is not supported by the information provided.
In the context of trade relationships, opportunity cost is crucial. Grand Coast can produce fish at a lower opportunity cost than Toland, meaning it sacrifices less in terms of other goods when producing fish. This advantage allows Grand Coast to specialize in fish production, leading to more efficient trade. Option A is incorrect as it suggests Grand Coast has the advantage in both timber and fish, which is unlikely in a comparative advantage scenario. Option B misstates the comparative advantage, assigning it to Toland for fish, which contradicts the opportunity cost analysis. Option C incorrectly asserts that Toland has a lower opportunity cost for timber, which is not supported by the information provided.