It is better to try to be original than to merely imitate others. People should always try to say, write, think, or create something new. There is little value in merely repeating what has been done before. People who merely copy or use the ideas and inventions of others, no matter how successful they may be, have never achieved anything significant
Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others? Plan and write a multi-paragraph essay (300-600 words) in which you develop your point of view on the above question. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer:
Originality fosters creativity and innovation, allowing individuals to express unique perspectives and solutions. It encourages critical thinking and personal growth, as developing one's ideas often leads to deeper understanding and mastery of a subject. Conversely, imitation can stifle creativity and limit personal expression. While learning from others can be beneficial, relying solely on their ideas may hinder the development of one's voice and perspective. Furthermore, excessive imitation can lead to plagiarism and a lack of authenticity, which are detrimental in academic and professional settings. In summary, while there is value in learning from others, prioritizing originality cultivates a richer, more diverse intellectual landscape.
Originality fosters creativity and innovation, allowing individuals to express unique perspectives and solutions. It encourages critical thinking and personal growth, as developing one's ideas often leads to deeper understanding and mastery of a subject. Conversely, imitation can stifle creativity and limit personal expression. While learning from others can be beneficial, relying solely on their ideas may hinder the development of one's voice and perspective. Furthermore, excessive imitation can lead to plagiarism and a lack of authenticity, which are detrimental in academic and professional settings. In summary, while there is value in learning from others, prioritizing originality cultivates a richer, more diverse intellectual landscape.
Other Related Questions
The author of Passage 1 would most likely characterize the claim of the "detractors" mentioned in Passage 2 as
- A. an unfair accusation
- B. a flattering portrayal
- C. an accurate description
- D. a flawed argument
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The author of Passage 1 would likely view the claim of the "detractors" as an accurate description, reflecting a critical stance towards the subject being discussed. This suggests that the detractors highlight valid concerns that resonate with the author's perspective. Option A, "an unfair accusation," implies bias against the detractors, which does not align with the author's objective analysis. Option B, "a flattering portrayal," contradicts the nature of criticism typically associated with detractors. Lastly, option D, "a flawed argument," suggests a dismissal of the detractors' points, which would not align with the author's acknowledgment of their validity.
The author of Passage 1 would likely view the claim of the "detractors" as an accurate description, reflecting a critical stance towards the subject being discussed. This suggests that the detractors highlight valid concerns that resonate with the author's perspective. Option A, "an unfair accusation," implies bias against the detractors, which does not align with the author's objective analysis. Option B, "a flattering portrayal," contradicts the nature of criticism typically associated with detractors. Lastly, option D, "a flawed argument," suggests a dismissal of the detractors' points, which would not align with the author's acknowledgment of their validity.
The passage implies that the true cause of the bridge collapse was
- A. low-quality materials
- B. short-sighted design
- C. substandard craftsmanship
- D. unexpectedly high winds
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The passage suggests that the bridge collapse stemmed from a fundamental flaw in its design, indicating that the planning and engineering did not adequately account for structural integrity. Option A, low-quality materials, implies that the materials used were inferior, but the passage does not emphasize material quality as the primary issue. Option C, substandard craftsmanship, points to poor construction practices, yet the focus of the passage leans more toward design deficiencies rather than execution. Option D, unexpectedly high winds, suggests an external factor causing the collapse, but the passage attributes the failure to inherent design shortcomings rather than environmental conditions.
The passage suggests that the bridge collapse stemmed from a fundamental flaw in its design, indicating that the planning and engineering did not adequately account for structural integrity. Option A, low-quality materials, implies that the materials used were inferior, but the passage does not emphasize material quality as the primary issue. Option C, substandard craftsmanship, points to poor construction practices, yet the focus of the passage leans more toward design deficiencies rather than execution. Option D, unexpectedly high winds, suggests an external factor causing the collapse, but the passage attributes the failure to inherent design shortcomings rather than environmental conditions.
The author of Passage 2 would most likely say that the opinion held by the "people" mentioned in the third sentence of Passage 1 ("Some people have declared") is
- A. accurate
- B. unsupported
- C. misguided
- D. amusing
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The opinion held by the "people" in Passage 1 is deemed accurate, as the author of Passage 2 likely aligns with the sentiment expressed. This suggests a shared understanding or validation of the viewpoint. Option B, "unsupported," is incorrect because the author likely provides evidence or reasoning that bolsters the opinion. Option C, "misguided," does not align with the author's perspective, which would not characterize the opinion as erroneous. Option D, "amusing," is inappropriate as it trivializes the opinion rather than acknowledging its validity.
The opinion held by the "people" in Passage 1 is deemed accurate, as the author of Passage 2 likely aligns with the sentiment expressed. This suggests a shared understanding or validation of the viewpoint. Option B, "unsupported," is incorrect because the author likely provides evidence or reasoning that bolsters the opinion. Option C, "misguided," does not align with the author's perspective, which would not characterize the opinion as erroneous. Option D, "amusing," is inappropriate as it trivializes the opinion rather than acknowledging its validity.
In 1952, Dwight Eisenhower was elected President of the United States, he won 55% of the vote.
- A. he won
- B. he had won
- C. with winning
- D. winning
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The phrase "winning" effectively conveys the action of Eisenhower's election in a succinct manner, emphasizing the achievement without the need for auxiliary verbs. Option A, "he won," is grammatically correct but less fluid in this context. It shifts focus to a completed action rather than the ongoing significance of his victory. Option B, "he had won," uses the past perfect tense, which implies a prior context that isn’t necessary here and complicates the sentence unnecessarily. Option C, "with winning," introduces an awkward prepositional phrase that detracts from the clarity and directness of the statement.
The phrase "winning" effectively conveys the action of Eisenhower's election in a succinct manner, emphasizing the achievement without the need for auxiliary verbs. Option A, "he won," is grammatically correct but less fluid in this context. It shifts focus to a completed action rather than the ongoing significance of his victory. Option B, "he had won," uses the past perfect tense, which implies a prior context that isn’t necessary here and complicates the sentence unnecessarily. Option C, "with winning," introduces an awkward prepositional phrase that detracts from the clarity and directness of the statement.